Nevada Privacy of Information Collected on the Internet from Consumers Act (NPICICA)

The Nevada Privacy of Information Collected on the Internet from Consumers Act (NPICICA) requires website operators to notify consumers about data collection practices and allows consumers to opt-out of the sale of their personal information.

JurisdictionNevada
CategoryPrivacy & Data Protection
StatusActive
Latest development

Analysis

Key Requirements

The Nevada Privacy of Information Collected on the Internet from Consumers Act (NPICICA) imposes several key requirements on website operators:

Compliance Challenges

Organizations face several challenges in complying with NPICICA:

  • Identifying Covered Information: Determining what constitutes "covered information" under the law can be complex, as highlighted in Cookiebot's analysis.
  • Verifying Consumer Requests: Establishing a reliable process to verify consumer identities for opt-out requests while protecting against fraudulent requests, as noted in IAPP's compliance guide.
  • Updating Data Practices: Modifying existing data collection and sharing practices to comply with the new requirements, which can be challenging for businesses with complex data ecosystems, according to Granica AI's report on data compliance issues.

Implementation Best Practices

To effectively implement NPICICA requirements:

Recent Updates

The most significant recent update to NPICICA was:

Related Regulations

NPICICA interacts with several other privacy regulations:

Industry Impact

NPICICA has had significant impacts across various industries:

Sources

Recent developments

  • — Nevada approved Senate Bill 370, a broader data privacy law that became effective on 2024-03-31. This is the most recent legislative update in the provided results and may affect how NPICICA is discussed in the wider Nevada privacy landscape. [5] (source)
  • — Nevada enacted SB 260, which expanded NPICICA by broadening the definition of “sale,” adding data brokers as covered entities, and creating additional exemptions. The amendment took effect on 2021-10-01. [4] (source)
  • — Industry guidance highlighted that the SB 260 amendment expanded consumer opt-out coverage and required operators and data brokers to publish a designated request address for verified requests. It also reinforced the 60-day response window for consumer requests and the up to $5,000-per-violation enforcement exposure. [3] (source)
  • — SB 220 took effect, giving Nevada consumers the right to opt out of the sale of their personal information and requiring websites to provide a designated request address. Compliance guidance emphasized updating privacy notices, request workflows, and response procedures. [2] (source)
  • — Local reporting on the law’s rollout said websites had to provide an email address or toll-free number for opt-out requests and respond within 90 days under the then-applicable framework. The article also noted enforcement by the Nevada attorney general and no private right of action. [6] (source)
  • — Bloomberg Law’s analysis of SB 220 said the law was narrower than the CCPA but still required operators to post an opt-out address, verify requests using commercially reasonable means, and stop future sales of covered information after a valid request. This framing is useful for understanding how the law was positioned in the privacy industry at enactment. [7] (source)
  • — Legal commentary explained that website operators collecting personal information from Nevada consumers needed to post a designated request address and explain how consumers could submit requests not to have their information sold. The guidance reflects the operational compliance burden created by the original law. [1] (source)

Read the full guide to Nevada Privacy of Information Collected on the Internet from Consumers Act (NPICICA)

Related regulations

Put it into practice

Browse all regulations · Compliance deadlines · Latest updates